NIAID's Antimicrobial Acquisition and Coordinating Facility
AACF
 

AACF Home

Submission Info
Screening Agreement
Compound Submission Form

Screening Assays
-Biodefense Virus Panel
-BK Virus
-Hepatitis B Virus
-Hepatitis C Virus
-Herpes Viruses
-Human Papilloma Virus
-Orthopoxviruses
-Respiratory Virus Panel
-SARS CoV

Data Interpretation
Medicinal Chemistry

Contact Info

Orthopoxviruses Assays

M. Prichard, Ph.D., University of Alabama Birmingham

General Approach for Determining Antiviral Activity and Toxicity for Orthopoxviruses

        Our approach for determining antiviral efficacy and toxicity of antiviral agents is to gain enough definitive information such that a compound can be taken into animal efficacy and toxicology studies and then into Phase I/II Clinical Studies. The experimental approach is based upon the following: 1) in our previous experience with this screening contract, we have found that a high percentage of samples submitted will not have activity or will be too toxic to evaluate. Therefore, an inexpensive, rapid assay such as a CPE-inhibition assay that is semi-automated needs to be used initially to screen out the negatives; 2) all screening assays are conducted in low-passaged human cells; 3) each assay system contains a positive control (CDV) and a negative control (ACV); 4) efficacy should be demonstrated by at least two different assay systems that detect functional biologic activity; 5) efficacy against VV and CV should be confirmed using other isolates; 6) toxicity is determined using both resting and proliferating human fibroblast cells; and 7) for selected compounds, toxicity in rodent myeloid and erythroid progenitor cells is assessed.

A.     Screening Assay Systems for Determining Antiviral Activity Against VV and CV

        Compounds are initially screened for activity using the CPE assay in HFF cells.  Further testing in two other cells lines, Vero and MRC-5, and against other strains of virus is possible for compounds that demonstrate activity in other assay systems.  All the screening assay systems utilized have been selected to show specific inhibition of a biologic function, i.e., cytopathic effect (CPE) in susceptible human cells.  In the CPE-inhibition assay, drug is added 1 hr prior to infection so the assay system will have maximum sensitivity and detect inhibitors of early replicative steps such as adsorption or penetration as well as later events.  To rule out non-specific inhibition of virus binding to cells all compounds that show reasonable activity in the CPE assay are confirmed using a classical plaque reduction assay in which the drug is added 1 hr after infection.  These assay systems also can be manipulated by increasing the pre-treatment time in order to demonstrate antiviral activity with oligodeoxynucleotides and/or peptides. By delaying the time of addition of drug after infection, information regarding which step in the virus life cycle is inhibited (i.e., early vs. late functions) can be gained.  Upon request by the program officer, a direct inactivation assay is employed to determine the virucidal activity of selected compounds.

1.     Efficacy.  In all the assays used for primary screening, a minimum of six drug concentrations was used covering a range of 100mg/ml to 0.03mg/ml, in 5-fold increments.  These data allow us to obtain good dose response curves.  From these data, we calculated the dose that inhibited viral replication by 50% (effective concentration 50; EC50) using the computer software program MacSynergy II by M.N. Prichard, K. R. Asaltine, and C. Shipman, Jr., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

2.     Toxicity.  The same drug concentrations used to determine efficacy were also used on uninfected cells in each assay to determine toxicity of each experimental compound.  The drug concentration that is cytotoxic to cells as determined by their failure to take up a vital stain, neutral red, (cytotoxic concentration 50; CC50) was determined as above.  We have utilized a neutral red uptake assay and found it to be reliable and reproducible and allows quantitation of toxicity based on the number of viable cells rather than cellular metabolic activity.

        It is important also to determine the toxicity of new compounds on dividing cells at a very early stage of testing.  We have found that a cell proliferation assay using HFF cells is a very sensitive assay for detecting drug toxicity to dividing cells and the drug concentration that inhibits cell growth by 50% (IC50) was calculated as described above.  In comparison with four human diploid cell lines and Vero cells, HFF cells are the most sensitive and predictive of toxicity for bone marrow cells.

3.     Assessment of Drug Activity.  To determine if each compound has sufficient antiviral activity that exceeds its level of toxicity, a selectivity index (SI) was calculated according to CC50/EC50. This index, also referred to as a therapeutic index, was used to determine if a compound warrants further study.  For these studies, a compound that had an SI of 10 or greater was evaluated in additional assay systems.

B.     Confirmation of Antiviral Activity and Toxicity for VV and CV

1.     Antiviral Activity.  Compounds that show activity in the CPE-inhibition assay will be confirmed using the plaque reduction assay.  Susceptibility of additional virus strains of VV and activity in other cell types will also be determined for selected compounds. 

2.     Toxicity.  In addition to the toxicity component incorporated into each assay system, a standardized cell cytotoxicity assay using a vital stain uptake (Neutral Red) will be performed using 7 days of drug exposure to confluent non-dividing cells.  This assay measures direct cell cytotoxicity (CC50).  For the past 15 years, we have utilized a neutral red uptake assay and found it to be reliable and reproducible and allows quantitation of toxicity based on the number of viable cells rather than cellular metabolic activity. It is important also to determine the toxicity of new compounds on dividing cells at a very early stage of testing.  We have found that a cell proliferation assay using HFF cells is a very sensitive assay for detecting drug toxicity to dividing cells and the drug concentration that inhibits cell growth by 50% (IC50) was calculated as described above. 

C.     Laboratory Procedures for Determining Antiviral Efficacy and Toxicity

1.     Preparation of compounds for in vitro testing.  The letter of agreement with the drug sponsor included in the RFP indicates that the sponsor will provide pertinent information regarding structure, molecular weight, solubility, toxicity and  any handling precautions the sponsor is aware of.  After receipt of the compound, they are entered into a log book and into the drug screening inventory data base, and are stored according to the location assigned.  The compounds are then weighed using an analytical balance and reconstituted in the appropriate vehicle.  It is critical at this point that solubility data be provided by the sponsor so drug is not wasted determining the solubility.  If the compound is water soluble, it will be dissolved in tissue culture medium without serum at 1 mg/ml and diluted for use as indicated below in the description of the assay system.  If the compound is not water soluble, then it is automatically dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mg/ml and diluted for use in each assay.  This has worked very well for the assays in HFF cells as DMSO is not toxic for these cells at the concentrations utilized (1.0%).  When DMSO or other solvents are used, control cultures receive media containing the same concentration of solvent as test cultures.  Although a compound that is not soluble would not be developed as an antiviral agent, it is important to determine if these compounds have activity so they can be modified chemically to increase their solubility.

2.     Screening and Confirmation Assays for VV and CV

a.     Preparation of Human Foreskin Fibroblast (HFF) Cells.  Newborn human foreskins are obtained as soon as possible after circumcision and placed in minimal essential medium (MEM) containing vancomycin, fungizone, penicillin, and gentamicin at the usual concentrations, for 4h.  The medium is then removed, the foreskin minced into small pieces and washed repeatedly with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) deficient in calcium and magnesium (PD) until red cells are no longer present.  The tissue is then trypsinized using trypsin at 0.25% with continuous stirring for 15 min at 37 C in a CO2 incubator.  At the end of each 15-min period the tissue is allowed to settle to the bottom of the flask.  The supernatant containing cells is poured through sterile cheesecloth into a flask containing MEM and 10% fetal bovine serum.  The flask containing the medium is kept on ice throughout the trypsinizing procedure.  After each addition of cells, the cheesecloth is washed with a small amount of MEM containing serum.  Fresh trypsin is added each time to the foreskin pieces and the procedure repeated until all the tissue is digested.  The cell-containing medium is then centrifuged at 1000 RPM at 4 C for 10 min.  The supernatant liquid is discarded and the cells resuspended in a small amount of MEM with 10% FBS.  The cells are then placed in an appropriate number of 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks.  As cells become confluent and need trypsinization, they are expanded into larger flasks.  The cells are kept on vancomycin and fungizone to passage four, and maintained on penicillin and gentamicin.  Cells are used only through passage 10.

b.     Cytopathic Effect Inhibition Assay

        Low passage HFF cells are seeded into 96 well tissue culture plates 24h prior to use at a cell concentration of 2.5 x 105 cells per ml in 0.1 ml of MEM supplemented with 10% FBS.  The cells are then incubated for 24h at 37 C in a CO2 incubator.  After incubation, the medium is removed and 125 ml of experimental drug is added to the first row in triplicate wells, all other wells having 100ml of MEM containing 2% FBS.  The drug in the first row of wells is then diluted serially 1:5 throughout the remaining wells by transferring 25ml using the BioMek 2000 Laboratory Automation Workstation.  After dilution of drug, 100 ml of the appropriate virus concentration is added to each well, excluding cell control wells, which received 100 ml of MEM.  The virus concentration utilized is 1000 PFU’s per well.  The plates are then incubated at 37 C in a CO2 incubator for 7 days.  After the incubation period, media is aspirated and the cells stained with a 0.1% crystal violet in 3% formalin solution for 4h.  The stain is removed and the plates rinsed using tap water until all excess stain is removed.  The plates are allowed to dry for 24h and then read on a BioTek Multiplate Autoreader at 620 nm.  The EC50 values are determined by comparing drug treated and untreated cells using a computer program.

c.     Plaque Reduction Assay using Semi-Solid Overlay

        Two days prior to use, HFF cells are plated into 6 well plates and incubated at 37 C with 5% CO2 and 90% humidity.  On the date of assay, the drug is made up at twice the desired concentration in 2X MEM and then serially diluted 1:5 in 2X MEM using 6 concentrations of drug. The initial starting concentration is usually 200 mg/ml down to 0.06 mg/ml.  The virus to be used is diluted in MEM containing 10% FBS to a desired concentration which will give 20-30 plaques per well.  The media is then aspirated from the wells and 0.2 ml of virus is added to each well in duplicate with 0.2 ml of media being added to drug toxicity wells.  The plates are then incubated for 1h with shaking every 15 min.  After the incubation period, an equal amount of 1% agarose will be added to an equal volume of each drug dilution.  This gives final drug concentrations beginning with 100mg/ml and ending with 0.03 mg/ml and a final agarose overlay concentration of 0.5%.  The drug/agarose mixture is applied to each well in 2 ml volume and the plates are incubated for 3 days, after which the cells are stained with a 0.01% solution of neutral red in phosphate buffered saline.  After a 5-6h incubation period, the stain is aspirated, and plaques counted using a stereomicroscope at 10X magnification. 

3.     Screening and Confirmation Assays for Toxicity

a.     Neutral Red Uptake Assay

        Twenty-four h prior to assay, HFF cells are plated into 96 well plates at a concentration of 2.5 x 104 cells per well.  After 24h, the media is aspirated and 125 ml of drug is added to the first row of wells and then diluted serially 1:5 using the BioMek 2000 Laboratory Automation Workstation in a manner similar to that used in the CPE assay.  After drug addition, the plates are incubated for 7 days in a CO2 incubator at 37 C.  At this time the media/drug is aspirated and 200 ul/well of 0.01% neutral red in PBS is added.  This is incubated in the CO2 incubator for 1h.  The dye is aspirated and the cells are washed using a Nunc Plate Washer.  After removing the PBS, 200 mg/well of 50% ETOH/1% glacial acetic acid (in H2O) is added.  The plates are rotated for 15 min and the optical densities read at 540 nm on a plate reader.  The EC50 values are determined by comparing drug treated and untreated cells using a computer program.

b.     Cell Proliferation Assay

        Twenty-four h prior to assay, HFF cells are seeded in 6-well plates at a concentration of 2.5 x 104 cells per well in MEM containing 10% FBS.  On the day of the assay, drugs are diluted serially in MEM containing 10% FBS at increments of 1:5 covering a range from 100 mg/ml to 0.03 mg/ml.  For drugs that have to be solubilized in DMSO, control wells receive MEM containing 1% DMSO.  The media from the wells is aspirated and 2 ml of each drug concentration is then added to each well.  The cells are incubated in a CO2 incubator at 37 C for 72h.  At the end of this time, the media-drug solution is removed and the cells washed.  One ml of 0.25% trypsin is added to each well and incubated until the cells start to come off of the plate.  The cell-media mixture is then pipetted up and down vigorously to break up the cell suspension and 0.2 ml of the mixture is added to 9.8 ml of Isoton III and counted using a Coulter Counter.  Each sample is counted 3 times with 2 replicate wells per sample. 

c.     Bone Marrow Clonogenic Assays.

        In vitro toxicity to bone marrow progenitor cells can be determined by inhibition of myeloid [colony-forming units granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM)] and erythroid [burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E)] colony formation in soft agar clonal assays (36, 37).  Using a 21-23 gauge needle attached to a syringe, rodent bone marrow cells are collected from the leg bone of rats or mice by flushing with Isocoves’ Modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM).  A single cell suspension is obtained by repeated aspiration through the needle.  Nucleated cells are enumerated with a hemacytometer and adjusted to the desired cell concentration in IMDM. Murine CFU-GM assays are prepared with 2.5 x 105 nucleated cells/ml,  20% FBS, 10 ng/ml rmGM-CSF, and 0.2% agarose.  BFU-E cultures include 30% FBS, 1% deionized BSA, 0.1 mM 2-ME, 4 U/ml rhEpo, 10 ng/ml rmIL-3, 2.5 x 105  nucleated cells/ml and 0.2% agarose.  Triplicate wells (in 6 well plates) containing 0.1ml of drug (10X) receive 1 ml of either culture mixture for each concentration group and slowly mixed.  The cultures are allowed to gel at 4 C and then incubated for 7 (CFU-GM) or 9 (BFU-E) days at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air.  Colonies are counted using an inverted microscope.  CFU-GM colonies are identified as cell clones containing at least 40 cells.  BFU-E cultures are stained with dianisidine, and aggregates of greater than 60 hemoglobin-containing cells are counted as erythroid colonies.  The median inhibitory concentration (IC50) and the 90% inhibitory concentration (IC90) are derived from linear regression analysis of the logarithm of drug concentration versus CFU-GM or BFU-E survival fraction. 

4.     Reporting of results

a.     Screening and confirmation of efficacy and toxicity

        A monthly reporting form for screening and evaluation of antiviral efficacy and toxicity is used to transmit results monthly to the Program Officer.  Included on the form are the month and year of report, the profile, dates of testing, EC50 and EC90 data for efficacy of the test and control compounds, the CC50 and IC50 for the toxicity tests, the SI for each test and a space for comments and recommendations.

© Copyright, 2003, The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). All rights reserved.
To report problems with this site, contact the webmaster.