NIAID's Antimicrobial Acquisition and Coordinating Facility
AACF
 

AACF Home

Submission Info
Screening Agreement
Compound Submission Form

Screening Assays
-Biodefense Virus Panel
-BK Virus
-Hepatitis B Virus
-Hepatitis C Virus
-Herpesviruses

-Human Papilloma Virus
-Orthopoxviruses
-Respiratory Virus Panel
-SARS CoV

Data Interpretation
Medicinal Chemistry

Contact Info

Click to navigate to the desired assay:
Southern Research Institute - Dr. Michael Murray
Georgetown University - Dr. Brent Korba

Hepatitis C Virus Assays

M. Murray, PhD., Southern Research Institute
B. Korba, Ph.D., Georgetown University


Southern Research Institute Details

HCV RNA Replicon Protocol

Introduction

We use the cell line Huh7 ET (luc-ubi-neo/ET), which contains a new HCV RNA replicon with a stable luciferase (LUC) reporter.  This particular construct has not been described in the scientific literature.  It is similar to the cell line 5-2 (1), but contains additional modifications that make the cell line more robust and provide stable LUC expression for antiviral screening.  This composition of the replicon is shown diagrammatically in Fig. 1.

 

Fig. 1.  Structure of the HCV RNA replicon of cell line ET.  The HCV RNA replicon ET contains the 5’ NTR (IRES) of HCV (5’) which drives the production of a firefly luciferase (Luc), ubiquitin (Ubiq), and neomycin phosphotransferase (Neo) fusion protein.  Ubiquitin cleavage releases the LUC and Neo genes.  The EMCV IRES element (E-I) controls the translation of the HCV structural proteins NS3-NS5.  The NS3 protein cleaves the HCV polyprotein to release the mature NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A and NS5B proteins that are required for HCV replication.  At the 3’ end of the replicon is the authentic 3’ NTR of HCV.  Not drawn to scale.

 The LUC reporter is used as an indirect measure of HCV replication.  The activity of the LUC reporter is directly proportional to HCV RNA levels and positive control antiviral compounds behave comparably using either LUC or RNA endpoints.  The use of the LUC endpoint is more economical than HCV RNA and can be used for high-throughput applications to screen libraries of compounds. 

 

Primary HCV RNA replicon assay

First we examine the effect of drugs added in triplicate at a single high-test concentration of 20 mM on HCV RNA-derived LUC activity and cytotoxicity.  Human interferon alpha-2b is included in each run as a positive control compound.  Subconfluent cultures of the ET line are plated out into 96-well plates that are dedicated for the analysis of cell numbers (cytotoxicity) or antiviral activity and the next day drugs are added to the appropriate wells.  Cells are processed 72 hr later when the cells are still subconfluent.  Compounds that reduced the LUC signal by 50% or more relative to the untreated cell controls move forward in the program.  Compound cytotoxicity is assessed as the percent viable cells relative to the untreated cell controls.  This data is also reported.

 

HCV RNA replicon confirmatory assay

The HCV RNA replicon comfirmatory assay is then used to examine the effects of compounds at five half-log concentrations each (Fig. 2).  Human interferon alpha-2b is included in each run as a positive control compound.  Subconfluent cultures of the ET line are plated out into 96-well plates that are dedicated for the analysis of cell numbers (cytotoxicity) or antiviral activity and the next day drugs are added to the appropriate wells.  Cells are processed 72 hr later when the cells are still subconfluent.  Compound EC50 and EC90 values (antiviral activity) are derived from HCV RNA levels assessed as either HCV RNA replicon-derived LUC activity or as HCV RNA using TaqMan RT-PCR.  Compound IC50 and IC90 values (cytotoxicity) are calculated using CytoTox-1 (Promega), a colorimetric assay used as an indicator of cell numbers and cytotoxicity when the LUC assay system is employed, while ribosomal (rRNA) levels determined via TaqMan RT-PCR are used as an indication of cell numbers in the RNA-based assay.   Compound selectivity indices SI50 and SI90 values are calculated from the spreadsheets (Fig. 3).

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

 

 

A

Drug 1 Color Control

20 mM

Drug 1 Color Control

6.3 mM

Drug 1 Color Control

2 mM

Drug 1 Color Control

0.63 mM

Drug 1 Color Control

0.2 mM

Media

Control

(Blank)

Media

Control

(Blank)

Drug 2 Color Control

20 mM

Drug 2 Color Control

6.3 mM

Drug 2 Color Control

2 mM

Drug 2 Color Control

0.63 mM

Drug 2 Color Control

0.2 mM

 

B

Media

Control

(Blank)

Cell

Control

Cell

Control

Cell

Control

Cell

Control

Cell

Control

Cell

Control

Cell

Control

Cell

Control

Cell

Control

Cell

Control

Media

Control

(Blank)

 

C

Media

Control

(Blank)

 

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 0.2 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 0.2 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 0.2 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 0.2 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 0.2 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 0.2 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 0.2 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 0.2 mM

  

Media

Control

(Blank)

 

D

Media

Control

(Blank)

 

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 0.63 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 0.63 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 0.63 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 0.63 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 0.63 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 0.63 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 0.63 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 0.63 mM

  

Media

Control

(Blank)

 

E

Media

Control

(Blank)

 

 

Drug 1 Toxicity Control

2 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control

2 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control

2 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control

2 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control

2 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control

2 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control

2 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control

2 mM

  

Media

Control

(Blank)

 

F

Media

Control

(Blank)

 

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 6.3 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 6.3 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 6.3 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 6.3 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 6.3 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 6.3 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 6.3 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 6.3 mM

  

Media

Control

(Blank)

 

G

Media

Control

(Blank)

 

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 20 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 20 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 20 mM

Drug 1 Toxicity Control 20 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 20 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 20 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 20 mM

Drug 2 Toxicity Control 20 mM

  

Media

Control

(Blank)

 

H

Drug 1 Color Control

20 mM

Drug 1 Color Control

6.3 mM

Drug 1 Color Control

2 mM

Drug 1 Color Control

0.63 mM

Drug 1 Color Control

0.2 mM

Media

Control

(Blank)

Media

Control

(Blank)

Drug 2 Color Control

20 mM

Drug 2 Color Control

6.3 mM

Drug 2 Color Control

2 mM

Drug 2 Color Control

0.63 mM

Drug 2 Color Control

0.2 mM

                                     

Fig. 2A.  Standardized 5-2 cell line antiviral evaluation 96-well plate format for the assessment of drug cytotoxicity. 
 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

 

 

A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

Media

Control

(Blank)

Virus Control

Drug 1 Antiviral Efficacy

0.2 mM

Drug 1 Antiviral Efficacy

0.2 mM

Drug 1 Antiviral Efficacy

0.2 mM

Drug 1 Antiviral Efficacy

0.2 mM

Drug 2 Antiviral Efficacy

0.2 mM

Drug 2 Antiviral Efficacy

0.2 mM

Drug 2 Antiviral Efficacy

0.2 mM

Drug 2 Antiviral Efficacy

0.2 mM

Virus Control

Media

Control

(Blank)

 

D

Media

Control

(Blank)

Virus Control

Drug 1 Antiviral Efficacy

0.63 mM

Drug 1 Antiviral Efficacy

0.63 mM

Drug 1 Antiviral Efficacy

0.63 mM

Drug 1 Antiviral Efficacy

0.63 mM

Drug 2 Antiviral Efficacy

0.63 mM

Drug 2 Antiviral Efficacy

0.63 mM

Drug 2 Antiviral Efficacy

0.63 mM

Drug 2 Antiviral Efficacy

0.63 mM

Virus Control

Media

Control

(Blank)

 

E

Media

Control

(Blank)

Virus Control

Drug 1 Antiviral Efficacy

2 mM

Drug 1 Antiviral Efficacy

2 mM

Drug 1 Antiviral Efficacy

2 mM

Drug 1 Antiviral Efficacy

2 mM

Drug 2 Antiviral Efficacy

2 mM

Drug 2 Antiviral Efficacy

2 mM